Under (add your price ranges) Inkjet Printers HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer
List Price :
Get Your Best Price at :
Product Details
- Brand: HP
- Model: Q3388A#ABA
Features
- Up to 4,800 x 1,200 optimized dpi color, 1,200 x 1,200 black, or 8-ink color
- Up to 20 ppm black and color speed, 4-by-6 photo as fast as 27 seconds
- 2.5-inch LCD to rotate, crop, zoom, and remove red-eye before printing
- Frame-by-frame video printing; slots for digital-camera memory cards
- USB, Ethernet, and PictBridge interfaces; PC and Mac compatible
Descriptions of Inkjet Printers HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer
Product Description
HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer
HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer is my personal favorite commodities published the foregoing week . Adjusted furthering you'll find it alone innovation , varied and accommodated no greater than for your self. And from now on there are a wide variety of wares it's possible get. Currently the full collections is engineered fx peculiar materials that actually have quality and trend. HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer is a favorite pick us . And FREEZING clearly strongly suggest it. With the external first class touchstones, hence bringing in this product a classy and of course long lasting . Many among us really love currently the HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer as countless versions of colorings , types , materials .
All of this is many suggested related to HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer.
- HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer is masterful and a top quality catalog .
- If The buyer concerned for pick up a bit of a HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer of your go out with savings, The buyer can easily try to view well over tip up to products details , specification or verbal description.
- Read exactly the reassessment in the event grant the customer to appreciate of a typical HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer cons and pros .
- You could make an attempt to get likewise stuff and in some places this substance helps oneself in selecting rent .
- You will certainly try out to find or ensure blogposts .
- Request for material of legal transfer item, grounds any poppycock is diverging terms additionally they condition.
Inkjet Printers HP PhotoSmart 8450 Inkjet Printer Customer Reviews
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
131 of 134 people found the following review helpful.
Absolutely Amazing
By Mel Irizarry
I picked the 8450 up after my Canon i950 died. I initially set it up in the kitchen so my wife could try it out. It's been 5 days now and the printer is still in the kitchen. With the media card slots and on board photo editing my wife has no need to use a computer. The red-eye removal works better than any software package I have ever used. The photos that print out are extremely close to that of dye-sublimation printers. The only cartridge that runs out the fastest is the Gray cartridge #100. The tri-color #97 and the photo color #99 are still reporting 3/4 full. This is after printing around (40) 4x6 photos and (15) 8.5 x 11 full page prints.
Definately use the HP Glossy paper. I originally printed on the leftover Canon Photo Paper Plus which was impressive. When I tried the HP Glossy paper, I was blown away by the difference. The Canon paper had a yellowish tinge to it which covered up the light pinks and blues, and the flesh tones looked a bit jaundiced. The HP paper brought out the colors as I have never seen before. Absolutely perfect right down to the subtle pinks in the flesh tones.
66 of 66 people found the following review helpful.
Color My World
By Brad C
I purchased an HP8450 over the holidays to produce some photos as gifts. For years I worked in photography, and I consider myself a professional with professional standards. I had actually very seriously considered just getting an HP 7960 printer as they are now clearanced in the US and available for about $150. The 8450 still hovers at a premium price of around $250, though I bought mine on sale for $220. In the past I've owned lower-end HPs, two Epsons which, due to their heads clogging after two months, I vowed never to buy Epson again, despite some excellent output while they're working. The Canon's are supposedly excellent printers, but the models I looked at seemed to be lacking in onboard features and had some ergonomic problems (like "push and click" doors that wouldn't stay closed) that were bothersome enough for me to eliminate them as a choice. HP's former top-of-the-line photo printer, the 7960 has recieved unanimous, excellent reviews and it's now lowered price makes it a very attractive option. But heading down to Staples, I had the chance to lay my eyes on the 8450. It just looked so much more solid than the 7960 that I had to find out if it was going to offer any improvements in photo quality. There are some comparison photos available at Photo-i (an excellent review site based in the UK) showed there was some difference between the two printers [...]%208450/page-3.htm . The 7960 looked a bit over-sharped, resulting in some jaggedness, as compared to the 8450's smooth (and somewhat off-putting) unfocused look. But as the reviewer points out here, these are huge blow-ups. For those who took away the same erroneous impression as I did, let me say that I've never seen crisper images from any photo printer I've owned than the 8450. They are really stunning. The pics from my Canon G2 have never looked better. Certainly better than any photo lab I've recently use (albeit generic services). Any fears of losing sharpness in gaining smoother prints were quickly abated when I began putting the 8450 through its paces. Now, how did the 7960 compare to the 8450? I think that's what's on a lot of people's mind considering which HP, at the moment. Honestly I could only do a rudimentary comparison at Staples, but it was enough to give me that final steer towards the 8450 (although it's superior build had already nudged me towards that precipice). The test anyone can run is using the HPs built-in sample photo -- one of those dreaded flower shots (why do manufacturers always insist on sticking flowers in my face. Are all photographers closet horticulturists?). I ran a printhead cleaning on both machines and then printed out the built-in test photo onto a sheet of HP Premium that had strayed nearby. Even from this little test, the 8450 appeared (to me) to best the 7960 in clarity. The stamin of the orchid was much better defined. All I can attribute this to might be the 8450 being a bit more precise in delivering its ink, resulting in better definition. Both samples looked very good, but the 8450 just shone more realistically. I studied the samples for 10 minutes, trying to give a reason for liking the 8450 print, whereas, at home, my wife picked up the two-side test print and immediately declared the 8450 the winner. Enuf said, I guess. I purchased the 8450 a half hour later. Eight prints later at home, I'm really in love with the printer. It's the FIRST time I haven't had to burn sheet after sheet of paper to get what I see on the screen. Almost true WYSIWYG color printing on my eMac 1.5ghz without any fudging with print settings. I think this is the printer's greatest strength. If you've ever tried getting acurate color from your computer screen to your prints, you know how hard is can be (plus a waste of ink and paper). The HP 8450 is the first printer I've ever owned that does it almost perfectly without any tinkering. It's absolutely simple to turn out a great prints straight out of the box. Great quality, combined with sturdy HP technology. A winning combination.
Side Notes: Inks ARE somewhat expensive. The gray HP 100 (about $25, and nearly impossible to find the cheaper) cartridge only let me print about 13 8x10 prints (and not heavy in black areas) before running out. I'm not very happy with this aspect of the printer. The other tri-colour cartridges have about 60% of their ink left, so be prepared to be buying additional gray cartridges. I really wish Hewlett Packard would put more ink into their supplies, it's not very fair to the consumer. It would cost them a few pennies, instead of multiple dollars for the customer.
It's for this reason I am giving an otherwise excellent product four stars.
Final Note: The HP software that comes with the printer is excellent under Mac OSX. Connectivity and ease is excellent. BUT... the additional HP printing software, namely the printing utility that lets you create "album pages", uses a terrible algorithm when resizing or rotating prints. I'd say you lose about 20% of your print quality; it's terribly noticable. If you want to resize or rotate your prints, you're much better off sticking with iPhoto.
79 of 86 people found the following review helpful.
Hp does it again, another must buy!
By James Borton
When I first saw this powerhouse printer on the shelves at CompUSA I couldn't believe they had replaced the 7960 printers already, but after further investigation, I found that this new model had some great improvements. Print quality is a bit better than last years models in that the colors seem more vibrant, and accurate to what the camera saw. The print speeds have jumped nicely, and the product itself feels more rugged. HP has thought of everything with this model. They included an Ethernet adapter in the unit to allow me to plug it right into my home network, and simplified the many options in the front of the printer for one touch printing, no PC necessary. The sales rep I spoke with also stated that they have found the new inks to last longer, so I won't be purchasing ink as often. He also said the pictures won't fade for over 100 years. I am very impressing with this printer! It has taking digital imaging to a new level at home.
See all 51 customer reviews...
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
131 of 134 people found the following review helpful.Absolutely Amazing
By Mel Irizarry
I picked the 8450 up after my Canon i950 died. I initially set it up in the kitchen so my wife could try it out. It's been 5 days now and the printer is still in the kitchen. With the media card slots and on board photo editing my wife has no need to use a computer. The red-eye removal works better than any software package I have ever used. The photos that print out are extremely close to that of dye-sublimation printers. The only cartridge that runs out the fastest is the Gray cartridge #100. The tri-color #97 and the photo color #99 are still reporting 3/4 full. This is after printing around (40) 4x6 photos and (15) 8.5 x 11 full page prints.
Definately use the HP Glossy paper. I originally printed on the leftover Canon Photo Paper Plus which was impressive. When I tried the HP Glossy paper, I was blown away by the difference. The Canon paper had a yellowish tinge to it which covered up the light pinks and blues, and the flesh tones looked a bit jaundiced. The HP paper brought out the colors as I have never seen before. Absolutely perfect right down to the subtle pinks in the flesh tones.
66 of 66 people found the following review helpful.Color My World
By Brad C
I purchased an HP8450 over the holidays to produce some photos as gifts. For years I worked in photography, and I consider myself a professional with professional standards. I had actually very seriously considered just getting an HP 7960 printer as they are now clearanced in the US and available for about $150. The 8450 still hovers at a premium price of around $250, though I bought mine on sale for $220. In the past I've owned lower-end HPs, two Epsons which, due to their heads clogging after two months, I vowed never to buy Epson again, despite some excellent output while they're working. The Canon's are supposedly excellent printers, but the models I looked at seemed to be lacking in onboard features and had some ergonomic problems (like "push and click" doors that wouldn't stay closed) that were bothersome enough for me to eliminate them as a choice. HP's former top-of-the-line photo printer, the 7960 has recieved unanimous, excellent reviews and it's now lowered price makes it a very attractive option. But heading down to Staples, I had the chance to lay my eyes on the 8450. It just looked so much more solid than the 7960 that I had to find out if it was going to offer any improvements in photo quality. There are some comparison photos available at Photo-i (an excellent review site based in the UK) showed there was some difference between the two printers [...]%208450/page-3.htm . The 7960 looked a bit over-sharped, resulting in some jaggedness, as compared to the 8450's smooth (and somewhat off-putting) unfocused look. But as the reviewer points out here, these are huge blow-ups. For those who took away the same erroneous impression as I did, let me say that I've never seen crisper images from any photo printer I've owned than the 8450. They are really stunning. The pics from my Canon G2 have never looked better. Certainly better than any photo lab I've recently use (albeit generic services). Any fears of losing sharpness in gaining smoother prints were quickly abated when I began putting the 8450 through its paces. Now, how did the 7960 compare to the 8450? I think that's what's on a lot of people's mind considering which HP, at the moment. Honestly I could only do a rudimentary comparison at Staples, but it was enough to give me that final steer towards the 8450 (although it's superior build had already nudged me towards that precipice). The test anyone can run is using the HPs built-in sample photo -- one of those dreaded flower shots (why do manufacturers always insist on sticking flowers in my face. Are all photographers closet horticulturists?). I ran a printhead cleaning on both machines and then printed out the built-in test photo onto a sheet of HP Premium that had strayed nearby. Even from this little test, the 8450 appeared (to me) to best the 7960 in clarity. The stamin of the orchid was much better defined. All I can attribute this to might be the 8450 being a bit more precise in delivering its ink, resulting in better definition. Both samples looked very good, but the 8450 just shone more realistically. I studied the samples for 10 minutes, trying to give a reason for liking the 8450 print, whereas, at home, my wife picked up the two-side test print and immediately declared the 8450 the winner. Enuf said, I guess. I purchased the 8450 a half hour later. Eight prints later at home, I'm really in love with the printer. It's the FIRST time I haven't had to burn sheet after sheet of paper to get what I see on the screen. Almost true WYSIWYG color printing on my eMac 1.5ghz without any fudging with print settings. I think this is the printer's greatest strength. If you've ever tried getting acurate color from your computer screen to your prints, you know how hard is can be (plus a waste of ink and paper). The HP 8450 is the first printer I've ever owned that does it almost perfectly without any tinkering. It's absolutely simple to turn out a great prints straight out of the box. Great quality, combined with sturdy HP technology. A winning combination.
Side Notes: Inks ARE somewhat expensive. The gray HP 100 (about $25, and nearly impossible to find the cheaper) cartridge only let me print about 13 8x10 prints (and not heavy in black areas) before running out. I'm not very happy with this aspect of the printer. The other tri-colour cartridges have about 60% of their ink left, so be prepared to be buying additional gray cartridges. I really wish Hewlett Packard would put more ink into their supplies, it's not very fair to the consumer. It would cost them a few pennies, instead of multiple dollars for the customer.
It's for this reason I am giving an otherwise excellent product four stars.
Final Note: The HP software that comes with the printer is excellent under Mac OSX. Connectivity and ease is excellent. BUT... the additional HP printing software, namely the printing utility that lets you create "album pages", uses a terrible algorithm when resizing or rotating prints. I'd say you lose about 20% of your print quality; it's terribly noticable. If you want to resize or rotate your prints, you're much better off sticking with iPhoto.
79 of 86 people found the following review helpful.Hp does it again, another must buy!
By James Borton
When I first saw this powerhouse printer on the shelves at CompUSA I couldn't believe they had replaced the 7960 printers already, but after further investigation, I found that this new model had some great improvements. Print quality is a bit better than last years models in that the colors seem more vibrant, and accurate to what the camera saw. The print speeds have jumped nicely, and the product itself feels more rugged. HP has thought of everything with this model. They included an Ethernet adapter in the unit to allow me to plug it right into my home network, and simplified the many options in the front of the printer for one touch printing, no PC necessary. The sales rep I spoke with also stated that they have found the new inks to last longer, so I won't be purchasing ink as often. He also said the pictures won't fade for over 100 years. I am very impressing with this printer! It has taking digital imaging to a new level at home.
This Page is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar