Who sells the cheapeston line Inkjet Printers Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201)
List Price : $799.99
Get Your Best Price at : $788.00
Product Details
- Size: One Size
- Color: One Color
- Brand: Epson
- Model: C11CA86201
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 24.20" h x 16.70" w x 32.00" l, 35.00 pounds
- Native resolution: 5760 x 1440
Features
- Industry-leading pigment ink technology - Epson UltraChrome K3 with Vivid Magenta Ink Technology for stunning color and black-and-white prints
- Individual high-capacity ink cartridges - change cartridges less often with nine 25.9 ml individual ink cartridges
- Advanced Media Handling - offers consistent, reliable performance with front-in, front-out paper path;
- Unparalleled connectivity - Hi-Speed USB 2.0, wireless 802.11n and 100 Mbit Ethernet support
- Auto-switching Black inks - achieve the highest black density and superior contrast on glossy
Descriptions of Inkjet Printers Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201)
Product Description
Unleash your creative inspiration with the advanced features and uncompromising quality of the Epson Stylus Photo R3000. This 13”-wide printer delivers the professional features you desire including high-capacity cartridges, networking and wireless connectivity, plus Advanced Media Handling. Epson UltraChrome K3® with Vivid Magenta pigment ink, combined with Epson’s innovative MicroPiezo® AMC™ print head, enables the R3000 to produce gallery-quality black-and-white output, plus vivid color prints with breathtaking blues and violets. Offering the latest in wired and wireless networking, the R3000 makes it easy to print from anywhere in your home or studio. Now, you can produce stunning wide-format images and professionally showcase your work.
Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201) is my favorite goods released this workweek. At the time of furthering its unparalleled invention , changed and already accommodated no more than for yourself . And here there are a wide selection of merchandise you are able get. The entire collections is constructed by using particular materials that in some way have world class and vogue . Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201) is a best loved pick many of us. Or even I JUST NOW powerfully highly recommend it. With the external world class measures , hence making this product a classy and not surprisingly lasting . Alot of among us really love currently the Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201) as a great many editions of colors , types , materials .
This is while many planned to do with Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201).
- Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201) is consummate and good quality products on hand .
- If You interested as a way for pick up a bit of a Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201) associated with a day special discounts , The individual can certainly example to check out well over peak of about product items , spec and description .
- Learn exactly the reassessment just in case allow the buyer to apprize of a typical Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201) cons or professionals.
- You surely could make an attempt to get alike stuff or even every now and then it helps oneself in picking out hire.
- You could possibly try out to view or even ensure posts .
- Request information of delivery detail , grounds every stuff is divergent term so they condition.
Inkjet Printers Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Wireless Wide-Format Color Inkjet Printer (C11CA86201) Customer Reviews
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
158 of 159 people found the following review helpful.
THE perfect photo printer for serious amateur photographers.
By Omega Man
At school I've been using an Epson Stylus Pro 3880 and have gotten kind of addicted to printing my photos. The R3000 is half the cost and almost exactly the same except for it's narrower 13" maximum print width (vs the 17" 3880). Both use the "UltraChrome K3 with Vivid Magenta" ink set which is the same one used by almost all of Epson's "Pro" line of printers. Honestly, I don't know why the R3000 isn't in their "Pro" line since it could reasonably be used by a pro who never needed to print anything wider than 13".
I printed some color test charts at the Sam's Club photo lab (which should be reasonable quality since they actually calibrate their printers at least once a day and when they change paper rolls) and on my R3000, then compared them to an actual X-Rite produced ColorChecker chart, and the output from the R3000 significantly beats the output from Sam's Fuji Frontier minilab photo printer. The Fuji Frontier print is noticeably duller with generally darker colors and a narrower range of saturated color reproduction. You don't have to be a color expert to see the difference.
For the R3000 the ink cost is about $1/ml which comes out to about $0.01 per square inch if you get it at a discount (search for "red river Cost of Inkjet Printing Epson R3000"). That makes a borderless 8x10 cost about $0.80 in ink, and a borderless 8.5x11" cost about $1 in ink. A sheet of Epson Ultra Premium Photo paper costs as little as $0.60 if you get it at a discount, so printing a borderless 8.5x11" ends up costing as little as $1.60 in supplies. (Not to mention that you can get third-party paper that's just as good or better than Epson's official paper for less money.)
The cheapest photo labs charge around $1.50 for an 8x10 (my local Sam's Club currently charges $1.46). If we use a whole 8.5x11 sheet of official paper and a full 8x10 worth of ink to print an 8x10, we get $1.40 in supplies per 8x10 which is slightly cheaper than even Sam's Club and significantly higher quality. Good third-party paper would be around $0.35/sheet meaning that you could also do as well as $1.15 per 8x10, maybe even better.
Admittedly though that doesn't incorporate the cost of the printer, which you won't have to incur if you just use a photo lab. If you bought the printer for say $800 and you've gotten your per-8x10 supply costs down to $1.15, then you'd need to print about 2,580 8x10's before your total costs started to get lower than Sam's Club's $1.46.
When you get larger than 8x10 though then the printer really starts to pay off. One place online that isn't too expensive and has a good reputation charges $6.30 for a 12x18 on glossy photo paper printed with a photographic lab process. It's possible to get decent 13x19" gloss ink jet photo paper (same stuff that costs $0.35/sheet for the 8.5x11) for about $1.50/sheet. 12x18" of ink costs you $2.16 so total cost for a 12x18 on the R3000 with that paper is $3.66. At that price you need to print 300 or so of these large prints before your prints start costing less than $6.30, and again the ink jet prints will have better color quality than the photographic process printer. You also have the entire lifetime of the printer to make all these prints that we're talking about. If you make on average about 10 8x10" prints every week then it would take about 5 years to make this cost back, but if you made two of the 12x18" prints per week then it would take about 2.8 years to brake even compared to the lower quality protographic process prints ordered online.
But none of these estimates take into account the value of the convenience and additional quality you get from having a modern photo inkjet printer right in front of you. Add in costs like transportation to pick up photos, time spent driving, any sort of cost of inconvenience by having to wait for prints to arrive in the mail, the additional value of better color quality, and other hard to quantify things then the real savings may be better. Depending on how much these costs add to the cost of photo lab prints, a decent ink jet printer like this might pay for itself much more quickly.
Still, you have to keep in mind that owning your own printer like this only makes sense if you're going to be doing a certain volume of printing. If you only ever print maybe 10 8x10s a month then the printer will never be worth it solely from a cost-per-print savings perspective. Also, if all you ever print is 4x6 then even just your ink cost without paper is going to be around 2.5x the cost of getting 4x6 prints made ata cheap online lab or drug store. So for small prints like 4x6 the printer will absolutely never pay for itself from the supply perspective, and probably not even from the convenience perspective.
The only problems I've heard of with this printer seem to involve priming the print head (pumping ink into the initially empty hoses that run from the ink cartridges to the print head, basically) and the printer going through unnecessary cleaning cycles, but Epson support is great about addressing these. My R3000 went though an unnecessary priming cycle when I first set it up, wasting about half the ink in the cartridges. Support got back to me in less than a day and offered to send me a full set of full replacement cartridges. I haven't seen anyone complaining of clogged nozzles or any of the usual inkjet problems.
The color gamut of the R3000 when used with the Ultra Premium Photo paper significantly exceeds the AdobeRGB colorspace in areas of dark blues and greens. This allows you to make the most of your camera's sensor capabilities IF you convert your RAW files into a format using the ProPhoto RGB color space (the most common one that actually holds those colors) AND print to the printer using proper color management with the appropriate ICC profile. Photo labs almost always require all files to be encoded as sRGB (which is smaller than both AdobeRGB and ProPhoto RGB), and printers like the Fuji Frontier have smaller gamuts than sRGB anyway, so they can't possibly achieve the wide range of colors that a high quality professional inkjet can when it's wielded by someone with sufficient color management skill.
Anyway, excellent printer, reasonable cost of ownership and operation, higher quality printing than you get at a photo lab, convenience, and excellent support from Epson. When you consider this part of your "digital darkroom" and compare its cost to the cost of materials and equipment you'd spend for an "old fashioned" film darkroom, the cost is quite reasonable.
78 of 81 people found the following review helpful.
Another fine Epson photo printer
By Busy Executive
I've been a long-time user of the Epson R2880, but after several years of very heavy use, it was getting to be time to replace the print head. Since this is an expensive repair on my trusty old R2880, I decided it might be more cost efficient to go with an entirely new printer, and this led me to look at the R3000.
While I was replacing my printer, I figured I'd also take a look at the competing HP and Canon products. Side by side against the HP and Canon products, I found the Epson to be a shade better, especially with black-and-white prints. It's not a dramatic difference, and maybe because I'm so used to the older R2880, I'm just biased towards Epson. Still, for me, it was enough to confirm my decision to go with the Epson R3000.
Compared to my R2880, it's hard to see any obvious differences on the R3000 in terms of print quality. B&W mode seems very slightly better on the R3000, and at magnification, small details seem slightly sharper. Otherwise, colors and so-called "bronzing" are about the same to my eye. Not that this is a bad thing, since the R2880 is a very fine printer in its own right. The R3000 uses essentially the same ink technology as the R2880, so I suppose not seeing a dramatic difference is to be expected.
While I'm comparing to the R2880, physically, the R3000 is about an inch deeper, weighs slightly more and has more of a squarish look. Still, even though there are marginal print quality improvements at best, there are several features I found worthwhile compared to the earlier generation. Some little touches - the removable power cord, for example, are helpful. The larger ink capacity is a significant boost to me...I'm getting many times more prints per ink change, and that's a good thing. I like the integrated LCD display, ink level monitors and control menus. Lets me put the printer far away from my computers and still be able to control it when I need to. And no more manual matte black/photo black switching is also a terrific feature, at long last.
Then there's the built-in networking capability, something I've been wanting for a long time. I was able to position the printer in another room, turn on the WiFi support (right from the printer), and now I can print anywhere without buying any sort of add-on network server. Getting up and running was really simple. I print from both Macs and Windows PCs, and once I had the wireless configured, I was able to install the drivers on multiple computers with no trouble. Whole thing from opening the box to printing the first page was under 15 minutes, and most of that time was installing the ink cartridges.
Speaking of drivers, they seemed to work flawlessly on Mac OS X 10.6, Windows 7 and Windows Vista. I've printed with iPhoto, Aperture, PhotoShop 5 and Nikon's Capture NX2 with no problems whatsoever. I've used the print profiles for all the papers I like to use, and am getting the results I expect. All in all, no surprises - and amazing prints.
I'd like to say that the construction quality is of a grade where the printer will last a long time, and for the most part, it is. If you print a medium number of prints, I'm sure this printer will last forever. Still, if you're like me and you print hundreds of prints every week, then I suppose the consumable parts of the printer will wear out long before the rest of it does, as was the case with my R2880. To me, this isn't necessarily a bad thing...I just assume I'm going to spend a few cents per page on printer hardware, and then I get to have the latest and greatest when they come along. At least until I find space for more of an industrial printer, like the Epson 7900 or something in that family.
Definitely recommended as the best 13x19 printer currently on the market.
65 of 67 people found the following review helpful.
Sweet Printer
By Sam in Iowa
I am a serious amateur photographer. Recently my Epson R1800 printer died. Based on my experience with two previous Epson printers and my research, I decided to purchase the R3000. I have had the printer for a couple months now and I am quite happy with my purchase. A quick summary of my observations are as follows: 1) it was very easy to set up; 2) the print speed is so much faster than my R1800 even at the quality setting; 3) having choices for quality settings is great, but I notice little difference between the speed, quality and maximum quality settings; 4) the automatic changing of the black inks works quite well; 5)I have printed up to 11 x 14 size prints and they are excellent; 6) the larger ink cartridges are much more convenient to use; and 7) the on screen menus and the user manual are prepared in an intuitive fashion. The bottom line is you can't go wrong with this printer.
See all 114 customer reviews...
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
158 of 159 people found the following review helpful.
By Omega Man
At school I've been using an Epson Stylus Pro 3880 and have gotten kind of addicted to printing my photos. The R3000 is half the cost and almost exactly the same except for it's narrower 13" maximum print width (vs the 17" 3880). Both use the "UltraChrome K3 with Vivid Magenta" ink set which is the same one used by almost all of Epson's "Pro" line of printers. Honestly, I don't know why the R3000 isn't in their "Pro" line since it could reasonably be used by a pro who never needed to print anything wider than 13".
I printed some color test charts at the Sam's Club photo lab (which should be reasonable quality since they actually calibrate their printers at least once a day and when they change paper rolls) and on my R3000, then compared them to an actual X-Rite produced ColorChecker chart, and the output from the R3000 significantly beats the output from Sam's Fuji Frontier minilab photo printer. The Fuji Frontier print is noticeably duller with generally darker colors and a narrower range of saturated color reproduction. You don't have to be a color expert to see the difference.
For the R3000 the ink cost is about $1/ml which comes out to about $0.01 per square inch if you get it at a discount (search for "red river Cost of Inkjet Printing Epson R3000"). That makes a borderless 8x10 cost about $0.80 in ink, and a borderless 8.5x11" cost about $1 in ink. A sheet of Epson Ultra Premium Photo paper costs as little as $0.60 if you get it at a discount, so printing a borderless 8.5x11" ends up costing as little as $1.60 in supplies. (Not to mention that you can get third-party paper that's just as good or better than Epson's official paper for less money.)
The cheapest photo labs charge around $1.50 for an 8x10 (my local Sam's Club currently charges $1.46). If we use a whole 8.5x11 sheet of official paper and a full 8x10 worth of ink to print an 8x10, we get $1.40 in supplies per 8x10 which is slightly cheaper than even Sam's Club and significantly higher quality. Good third-party paper would be around $0.35/sheet meaning that you could also do as well as $1.15 per 8x10, maybe even better.
Admittedly though that doesn't incorporate the cost of the printer, which you won't have to incur if you just use a photo lab. If you bought the printer for say $800 and you've gotten your per-8x10 supply costs down to $1.15, then you'd need to print about 2,580 8x10's before your total costs started to get lower than Sam's Club's $1.46.
When you get larger than 8x10 though then the printer really starts to pay off. One place online that isn't too expensive and has a good reputation charges $6.30 for a 12x18 on glossy photo paper printed with a photographic lab process. It's possible to get decent 13x19" gloss ink jet photo paper (same stuff that costs $0.35/sheet for the 8.5x11) for about $1.50/sheet. 12x18" of ink costs you $2.16 so total cost for a 12x18 on the R3000 with that paper is $3.66. At that price you need to print 300 or so of these large prints before your prints start costing less than $6.30, and again the ink jet prints will have better color quality than the photographic process printer. You also have the entire lifetime of the printer to make all these prints that we're talking about. If you make on average about 10 8x10" prints every week then it would take about 5 years to make this cost back, but if you made two of the 12x18" prints per week then it would take about 2.8 years to brake even compared to the lower quality protographic process prints ordered online.
But none of these estimates take into account the value of the convenience and additional quality you get from having a modern photo inkjet printer right in front of you. Add in costs like transportation to pick up photos, time spent driving, any sort of cost of inconvenience by having to wait for prints to arrive in the mail, the additional value of better color quality, and other hard to quantify things then the real savings may be better. Depending on how much these costs add to the cost of photo lab prints, a decent ink jet printer like this might pay for itself much more quickly.
Still, you have to keep in mind that owning your own printer like this only makes sense if you're going to be doing a certain volume of printing. If you only ever print maybe 10 8x10s a month then the printer will never be worth it solely from a cost-per-print savings perspective. Also, if all you ever print is 4x6 then even just your ink cost without paper is going to be around 2.5x the cost of getting 4x6 prints made ata cheap online lab or drug store. So for small prints like 4x6 the printer will absolutely never pay for itself from the supply perspective, and probably not even from the convenience perspective.
The only problems I've heard of with this printer seem to involve priming the print head (pumping ink into the initially empty hoses that run from the ink cartridges to the print head, basically) and the printer going through unnecessary cleaning cycles, but Epson support is great about addressing these. My R3000 went though an unnecessary priming cycle when I first set it up, wasting about half the ink in the cartridges. Support got back to me in less than a day and offered to send me a full set of full replacement cartridges. I haven't seen anyone complaining of clogged nozzles or any of the usual inkjet problems.
The color gamut of the R3000 when used with the Ultra Premium Photo paper significantly exceeds the AdobeRGB colorspace in areas of dark blues and greens. This allows you to make the most of your camera's sensor capabilities IF you convert your RAW files into a format using the ProPhoto RGB color space (the most common one that actually holds those colors) AND print to the printer using proper color management with the appropriate ICC profile. Photo labs almost always require all files to be encoded as sRGB (which is smaller than both AdobeRGB and ProPhoto RGB), and printers like the Fuji Frontier have smaller gamuts than sRGB anyway, so they can't possibly achieve the wide range of colors that a high quality professional inkjet can when it's wielded by someone with sufficient color management skill.
Anyway, excellent printer, reasonable cost of ownership and operation, higher quality printing than you get at a photo lab, convenience, and excellent support from Epson. When you consider this part of your "digital darkroom" and compare its cost to the cost of materials and equipment you'd spend for an "old fashioned" film darkroom, the cost is quite reasonable.
78 of 81 people found the following review helpful.
By Busy Executive
I've been a long-time user of the Epson R2880, but after several years of very heavy use, it was getting to be time to replace the print head. Since this is an expensive repair on my trusty old R2880, I decided it might be more cost efficient to go with an entirely new printer, and this led me to look at the R3000.
While I was replacing my printer, I figured I'd also take a look at the competing HP and Canon products. Side by side against the HP and Canon products, I found the Epson to be a shade better, especially with black-and-white prints. It's not a dramatic difference, and maybe because I'm so used to the older R2880, I'm just biased towards Epson. Still, for me, it was enough to confirm my decision to go with the Epson R3000.
Compared to my R2880, it's hard to see any obvious differences on the R3000 in terms of print quality. B&W mode seems very slightly better on the R3000, and at magnification, small details seem slightly sharper. Otherwise, colors and so-called "bronzing" are about the same to my eye. Not that this is a bad thing, since the R2880 is a very fine printer in its own right. The R3000 uses essentially the same ink technology as the R2880, so I suppose not seeing a dramatic difference is to be expected.
While I'm comparing to the R2880, physically, the R3000 is about an inch deeper, weighs slightly more and has more of a squarish look. Still, even though there are marginal print quality improvements at best, there are several features I found worthwhile compared to the earlier generation. Some little touches - the removable power cord, for example, are helpful. The larger ink capacity is a significant boost to me...I'm getting many times more prints per ink change, and that's a good thing. I like the integrated LCD display, ink level monitors and control menus. Lets me put the printer far away from my computers and still be able to control it when I need to. And no more manual matte black/photo black switching is also a terrific feature, at long last.
Then there's the built-in networking capability, something I've been wanting for a long time. I was able to position the printer in another room, turn on the WiFi support (right from the printer), and now I can print anywhere without buying any sort of add-on network server. Getting up and running was really simple. I print from both Macs and Windows PCs, and once I had the wireless configured, I was able to install the drivers on multiple computers with no trouble. Whole thing from opening the box to printing the first page was under 15 minutes, and most of that time was installing the ink cartridges.
Speaking of drivers, they seemed to work flawlessly on Mac OS X 10.6, Windows 7 and Windows Vista. I've printed with iPhoto, Aperture, PhotoShop 5 and Nikon's Capture NX2 with no problems whatsoever. I've used the print profiles for all the papers I like to use, and am getting the results I expect. All in all, no surprises - and amazing prints.
I'd like to say that the construction quality is of a grade where the printer will last a long time, and for the most part, it is. If you print a medium number of prints, I'm sure this printer will last forever. Still, if you're like me and you print hundreds of prints every week, then I suppose the consumable parts of the printer will wear out long before the rest of it does, as was the case with my R2880. To me, this isn't necessarily a bad thing...I just assume I'm going to spend a few cents per page on printer hardware, and then I get to have the latest and greatest when they come along. At least until I find space for more of an industrial printer, like the Epson 7900 or something in that family.
Definitely recommended as the best 13x19 printer currently on the market.
65 of 67 people found the following review helpful.
By Sam in Iowa
I am a serious amateur photographer. Recently my Epson R1800 printer died. Based on my experience with two previous Epson printers and my research, I decided to purchase the R3000. I have had the printer for a couple months now and I am quite happy with my purchase. A quick summary of my observations are as follows: 1) it was very easy to set up; 2) the print speed is so much faster than my R1800 even at the quality setting; 3) having choices for quality settings is great, but I notice little difference between the speed, quality and maximum quality settings; 4) the automatic changing of the black inks works quite well; 5)I have printed up to 11 x 14 size prints and they are excellent; 6) the larger ink cartridges are much more convenient to use; and 7) the on screen menus and the user manual are prepared in an intuitive fashion. The bottom line is you can't go wrong with this printer.
This Page is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar